Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Anderson v. Thomas et al
as 1:2021cv00683
Plaintiff:
Terrence Anderson
Defendant:
Sgt. W. Thomas, Corizon Health Contractor's, CO II C. Dolly and others
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Berger v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2018cv03568
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Brian E. Frosh and others
Plaintiff:
William James Berger, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
James v. Butler
as 8:2020cv00441
Defendant:
Kevin T. Butler
Plaintiff:
William James, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Berger v. Towson University, et al
as 1:2018cv01074
Plaintiff:
William James R. Berger, III
Defendant:
Towson University, Worchester County, Maryland, Cecil County, Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Cortez et al
as 8:2014cv02815
Plaintiff:
Walter Edward Hall
Defendant:
Kristi Cortez, Colin C Ottey, Ava Joubert-Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Green et al
as 8:2013cv02063
Petitioner:
William James Mitchell
Respondent:
Kathleen S. Green and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paikin et al v. Turner et al
as 1:2011cv02488
Plaintiff:
Alan H. Paikin and Susan F. Paikin
Defendant:
William James Turner , Cory Kuczynski , Edward Kuczynski and others
Cross_claimant:
Linda Kuczynski , Cory Kuczynski , Edward Kuczynski and others
Cross_defendant:
William James Turner , Cory Kuczynski , Edward Kuczynski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rao et al v. Net Equity Financial, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02752
Plaintiff:
Heather Rao, John Hill and Richard Thobe
Defendant:
Net Equity Financial, Inc., William James Peterson, III and Robert Lee Windsor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
