Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Sofia Cano v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6200
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DR. CHRIS KUNKLE and others
Tate v. Langdon, III
as 1:2024cv00771
Petitioner:
Antonio Emerson Tate
Respondent:
William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowers v. Warden William Langdon, III
as 0:2024cv00287
Petitioner:
David Andrew Bowers
Respondent:
Warden William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Macon v. Stirling et al
as 0:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
Arthur William Macon
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling, South Carolina Department of Corrections and William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terron Dizzley v. William Langdon
as 23-7312
Petitioner:
TERRON GERHARD DIZZLEY
Respondent:
WARDEN WILLIAM LANGDON
Woods v. Langdon
as 9:2023cv06377
Petitioner:
Cedric L. Woods
Defendant:
William Langdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dizzley v. Warden William Langdon
as 8:2023cv04221
Petitioner:
Terron Gerhard Dizzley
Respondent:
Warden William Langdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Langdon
as 9:2023cv00990
Petitioner:
Comest Sabatino Allen
Respondent:
William Langdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CANO v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2022cv04247
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P. Stirling, DR. Chris Kunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Reid-el v. MacDougall Correctional and Agents et al
as 6:2021cv02997
Plaintiff:
Bobby J Reid-el, Bobby Joe Reid-El and Bobby Joe Reid, Jr
Defendant:
MacDougall Correctional and Agents, Wilfredo Martell, William Langdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
