Cases 11 - 20 of 24
PREZIOSI v. NICHOLSON et al
as 2:2019cv01437
Defendant:
MARY ELLEN TORMEY, WILLIAM NICHOLSON, STEPHANIE WOODS and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOSEPH PREZIOSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIS v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv01196
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-25, WILLIAM NICHOLSON, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LAYTON v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00822
Defendant:
WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. LANE C. DEFRANCISO, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE A. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL
as 2:2019cv00790
Defendant:
MARK HICE, HARRY CANCELMI, OFFICER JORDAN and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL
as 2:2019cv02731
Defendant:
MARK HICE, HARRY CANCELMI, T.A. LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv02231
Defendant:
SUPT. FERGUSON, SUPT. GILMORE, DEPUTY DIALASANDRO and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. GILLMORE et al
as 2:2019cv00397
Defendant:
AUSTIN, JOHNSON, CARO and others
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS A. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PEARSON v. NOEL et al
as 2:2019cv00177
Plaintiff:
RICKY PEARSON
Defendant:
DR. PAUL NOEL, ROBERT GILMORE, MR. HAMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CHMIEL v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01691
Defendant:
CHCA WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. MIN HI PARK, DR. SMYTH and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHMIEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. HOUSE et al
as 2:2018cv01130
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, T. POZIVIAK, M. OPPMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
