Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Lori Nicholson, et al v. Biomet, Inc., et al
as 21-2263
Defendant / Appellant:
Biomet Orthopedics,LLC, Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC, Biomet Manufacturing LLC, formerly known as Biomet Manufacturing Corp. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lori Nicholson
Plaintiff:
Willis William Nicholson
RAMBERT v. SHAWLEY et al
as 2:2021cv00424
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Defendant:
TRACY SHAWLEY, NICHOLSON, HAMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NICHOLSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv19332
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JACK WILLIAM NICHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv00343
Defendant:
C/O 2 HARAUSE, C/O1 JEREMIAH LEWIS, WILLIAM NICHOLSON and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MAJOR v. HALLIGAN et al
as 1:2021cv00068
Defendant:
WILLIAM NICHOLSON, PAUL ENNIS, ERICSON and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MAJOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LAYTON v. SMYTH et al
as 2:2020cv00519
Defendant:
WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. DENISE SMYTH, ROBERT D. GILMORE and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE A. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PREZIOSI v. NICHOLSON et al
as 2:2019cv01437
Defendant:
MARY ELLEN TORMEY, WILLIAM NICHOLSON, STEPHANIE WOODS and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOSEPH PREZIOSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIS v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv01196
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-25, WILLIAM NICHOLSON, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LAYTON v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00822
Defendant:
WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. LANE C. DEFRANCISO, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE A. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL
as 2:2019cv00790
Defendant:
MARK HICE, HARRY CANCELMI, OFFICER JORDAN and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
