Cases 51 - 60 of 356
N.H. R.L. v. William Barr
as 20-3009
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
N.H. R.L.
Yves Mabuneza v. William Barr
as 20-2998
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
YVES MABUNEZA
Yamile Garduno-Becerril v. William P. Barr
as 20-3147
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
Yamile Garduno-Becerril
Eva Becerril-Sanchez v. William P. Barr
as 20-3146
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
Eva Maria Becerril-Sanchez
Reyes-Caparros v. Barr
as 20-1792
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCISCO J. REYES-CAPARROS
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Maryan Ali v. William P. Barr
as 20-3125
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
Maryan Hassan Ali
Marmolejo v. Barr
as 20-9611
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
LUIS MIGUEL SILVA MARMOLEJO
I.A., et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-5271
Plaintiff / Appellee:
M.X., by and through his mother, A.C., by and through his mother, Y.D. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Mark L. Morgan, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, United States Customs and Border Protection, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity and others
City of Evanston, Illinois, et al v. William Barr
as 20-2447
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY OF EVANSTON, ILLINOIS and UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS
Jose Avalos v. William Barr
as 20-1394
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
Jose Guadalupe Avalos
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
