Cases 41 - 50 of 129
Dorsey v. Reubart et al
as 3:2022cv00508
Petitioner:
Denzel R. Dorsey
Respondent:
William Reubart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Cooke et al
as 3:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Diondrae L. Parker
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke, William Reubart, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Roman et al
as 3:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Shane Brooks
Defendant:
Lt Roman, Lt Davis, Chet Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Lisle v. William Reubart, et al
as 22-99009
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN JAMES LISLE
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART and AARON D. FORD
Hearring v. Reubart et al
as 3:2022cv00377
Petitioner:
Frank Hearring
Respondent:
William Reubart and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castro v. Reubart et al
as 3:2022cv00367
Petitioner:
Luis Angel Castro
Respondent:
William Reubart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Dreesen et al
as 2:2022cv01231
Plaintiff:
Ammar Harris
Defendant:
F. Dreesen, Morin, Johnson and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trost v. Cooke et al
as 3:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Roy Trost and Daisy Lynne Meadows
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke, M.H. Hayman, Don Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Sisolak et al
as 2:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Ammar Harris
Defendant:
Steven Sisolak, Barbara Cegavske, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iske v. H.D.S.P. et al
as 2:2022cv01035
Plaintiff:
Harlan Iske
Defendant:
H.D.S.P., H.D.S.P. Medical Staff, Sonya Corriton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
