Cases 11 - 20 of 150
Dodds v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04040
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Dodds
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bhakta et al v. Thomas, Jr. et al
as 2:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Suryakant Bhakta and Savitaben Bhakta
Defendant:
Eddie Williams Thomas, Jr. and Tri National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20886
Plaintiff:
ERIC WILLIAM THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Webb v. Kappa Sigma Fraternity et al
as 3:2022cv00808
Defendant:
Kappa Sigma Fraternity, Kappa Sigma International Fraternity, Kappa Iota and others
Plaintiff:
Jalen Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HAMM v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20067
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM THOMAS HAMM, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
OROLIM v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14377
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM THOMAS OROLIM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SPELLMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13409
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM THOMAS SPELLMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MOORE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11817
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM THOMAS MOORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALSH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08775
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM THOMAS WALSH JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sutton et al v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Sutton, Elizabeth H. Sutton and William Thomas Sutton
Defendant:
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
