Cases 1 - 10 of 1,546
Rundquist: v. Crane et al
as 4:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Scott-Gregory Rundquist:
Defendant:
Sue Crane, Family Support Division, Andrew Bailey and others
Rosie Davis v. William Franks
as 24-1927
Plaintiff:
Rosie L. Davis
Defendant:
William Dale Franks
Intervenor:
Arkansas Department of Education, The and Arkansas State Board of Education, The
Blankenship v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Shane Blankenship
Defendant:
Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, E. Williams and A Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Uwazurike et al v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Eyioma Uwazurike, Noah Shannon, Nelson Brands and others
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Iowa Department of Public Safety, Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams-Goode et al v. Division of Youth Services
as 4:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Williams-Goode and S.B.
Defendant:
Division of Youth Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Williams et al v. Elmore et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Rosetta Williams and Andrea Covington
Defendant:
Terry Elmore, Dylan Stevens and City of Hayti, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Williams-Goode et al v. State of Missouri
as 4:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Williams-Goode, S.B., D.W. and others
Defendant:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belt v. City of Rapid City et al
as 5:2024cv05021
Plaintiff:
William Belt
Defendant:
City of Rapid City and Michelle Paulson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
