Cases 1 - 10 of 4,031
Carter v. Huhn
as 4:2024cv00630
Petitioner:
William Billy G. Carter
Respondent:
Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rundquist: v. Crane et al
as 4:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Scott-Gregory Rundquist:
Defendant:
Sue Crane, Family Support Division, Andrew Bailey and others
Blankenship v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Shane Blankenship
Defendant:
Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, E. Williams and A Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Kiesha Williams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams-Goode v. Williams
as 4:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Williams-Goode
Defendant:
Allen J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Williams-Goode v. Barnes Jewish Hospital
as 4:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Williams-Goode
Defendant:
Barnes Jewish Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Williams-Goode et al v. Division of Youth Services
as 4:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Williams-Goode and S.B.
Defendant:
Division of Youth Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lopez v. Williams
as 6:2024cv03115
Petitioner:
Juan Lopez
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moody v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Moody
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Billy Dunbar, Almalee Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Elmore et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Rosetta Williams and Andrea Covington
Defendant:
Terry Elmore, Dylan Stevens and City of Hayti, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
