Cases 1 - 10 of 20,608
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
ALKHATIB v. RICHARDS et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
LATIF ALKHATIB
Defendant:
M. RICHARDS, E. BROWN, R. WESTOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams
as 2:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Ryan Williams
Defendant:
County of Butler, Pennsylvania, Butler County Prison, Prison Board of Butler County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
WILLIAMS v. RIVELLO et al
as 2:2024cv01699
Petitioner:
JAMIEL LAWRENCE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
J. RIVELLO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KRIEGER v. GML LOGISTICS LLC
as 2:2024mc00437
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G KRIEGER
Defendant:
GML LOGISTICS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
KRIEGER v. GML LOGISTICS LLC
as 2:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G KRIEGER
Defendant:
GML LOGISTICS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
