Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marston v. Bellsouth Communications LLC
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff: Scott William Marston
Defendant: Bellsouth Communications LLC
Williams v. Tik-Tok, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff: Wendy M. Williams
Defendant: Tik-Tok, Inc., Zhang Yiming and TIK TOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. AT&T
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff: Wendy M. Williams
Defendant: AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Berger v. Skully et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff: Kenneth Berger
Defendant: William E. Skully, Jr, J. Dean, Michele M. Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. St Luke's Episcopal School
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff: Arisha Williams Bradley
Defendant: St Luke's Episcopal School
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Williams v. Nexstar Media Group et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff: Wendy M. Williams
Defendant: Nexstar Media Group, Perry A. Sooks, Geoff Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Nexstar Media Group et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff: Wendy M. Williams
Defendant: Nexstar Media Group, Perry Sooks, Geoff Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Spring Hill College et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00340
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Spring Hill College, Craig McVey, William Robert Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?