Cases 21 - 30 of 4,140
Jacoby v. Dr. Fish et al
as 7:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Dr. Fish, Ms. Perkins and Ms. Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RoettO'Connor v. Pelham, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Gregjoy RoettO'Connor
Defendant:
Pelham, City of, Clifton Powell, William Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hill et al v. Warren Averett LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Mildred Susan Hill and Bryan Hirsch
Defendant:
Warren Averett LLC, Warren Averett Companies LLC, Mary Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Williams et al v. Restaurants, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Barbara Williams and Gladys Yvonne Smith
Defendant:
Piccadilly Restaurants, LLC, Piccadilly Holdings, LLC, Danny Grubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Williams v. Mitchell
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Roderick Lee Williams
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. AT&T
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Investar Bank National Association v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Investar Bank National Association
Defendant:
Shad Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Swint v. Williams et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Darryl Swint
Defendant:
Karen Williams and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moon v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Debra Moon
Defendant:
Eddie Jones, Sherry Briggs, Marcus Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
