Cases 41 - 50 of 1,966
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Clayton v. Henderson Investors, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Chris Clayton
Defendant:
Henderson Investors, LLC and The Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lozano-Bustos v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02036
Petitioner:
William Lozano-Bustos
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Reginald Randolph Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Dennis v. Kerns-Correll et al
as 5:2024ct03033
Plaintiff:
Antwain Lamar Dennis
Defendant:
Joyce Y. Kerns-Correll, Warden Williams, Case Manager Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pike v. Libby et al
as 5:2024ct03031
Plaintiff:
Nathan Pike
Defendant:
Officer Tammy Libby, Sgt. William Owens, Officer Cory Lindsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Lindsay
as 5:2024ct03025
Plaintiff:
Harold Lee Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Corey Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State Employees Credit Union
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Devonte Williams
Defendant:
State Employees Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Holder et al v. Bailo
as 5:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Braxton Holder and Edward L. Weaver
Defendant:
Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro, Joan M. Hilson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
