Cases 21 - 30 of 1,965
King v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02068
Petitioner:
Darnell William King
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Sonya Felecia Williams and Sonya Williams
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, Estella Patterson, Christopher D Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Williams v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Stacey Williams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
William Howard Blair and Darrell Eugene Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
LeRoy v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
William LeRoy
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Christian v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
William David Christian, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Daniels v. USA
as 5:2024cv00152
Petitioner:
William Isaac Daniels
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Donail Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Bardge v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
William Alvin Bardge
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Williams v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2024hc02048
Petitioner:
Chris Shawn Williams and Christopher Shawn Williams
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
