Cases 31 - 40 of 1,965
DeBold v. Stocks et al
as 5:2024ct03054
Plaintiff:
Antoine A. DeBold
Defendant:
Sergeant Stocks, C/O Williams, C/O Everrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. McMahon et al
as 5:2024ct03053
Plaintiff:
Harold Boyd, Jr
Defendant:
Edward J. McMahon, Major Price, Batman Whitmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Brammer
as 5:2024ct03051
Plaintiff:
Quashon Treyvaughn Williams
Defendant:
Officer Brammer and Unknown Pert Team Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hawkins v. Fountain, et al.
as 5:2024ct03048
Plaintiff:
Justin Hawkins
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Robert Fountain, Fred Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linden v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
KAMA LINDEN
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Gilbert v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Gilbert
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Johnson v. Harnett County Detention Center
as 5:2024ct03046
Plaintiff:
William Kirk Johnson
Defendant:
Harnett County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gervat v. Bailo et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro, Joan M. Hilson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
