Cases 1 - 10 of 312
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ryan T. Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Jacob et al
as 6:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Felipa D. Sanchez
Defendant:
Ryan P. Jacob, Williams Sausage Co. Inc. and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Loggins v. Huffman et al
as 6:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Loggins
Defendant:
J. Huffman, C. Kirkland, Unknown Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wildman et al v. Integon National Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
William Warren Wildman, Jr. and Mary Kelly Wildman
Defendant:
Integon National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stevens v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Belinda Ann Williams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wild v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
John William Wild
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Funk v. Rankins
as 6:2023cv00413
Petitioner:
Derek Funk
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodroff v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Woodroff
Defendant:
Shannon Smith, Adam Good, Steve Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Garrett v. Anderson et al
as 6:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Marvin Garrett
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Anderson, Errol R. Arthur, Julie Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
