Cases 1 - 10 of 3,980
Doe #1 MKC et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (MKC) and John Doe #2 (JAS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #066 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
John Doe #066
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hill v. Haney et al
as 3:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Shaun Hill
Defendant:
William Haney, Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP and Delaware Valley Shippers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Robertson v. Wellpath Care et al
as 2:2024cv02306
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lashea Robertson and Ronnie Lashea Williams
Defendant:
Wellpath Care, Richard Holiday, Latrena Demens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Creasy v. Core Civic, Trousdale Turner Corr. Center et al
as 3:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
William G. Creasy
Defendant:
Core Civic, Trousdale Turner Corr. Center and TTCC Medical Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Williams
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #063 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
John Doe #063
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #064 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
John Doe #064
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #065 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
John Doe #065
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
