Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tankcraft Corporation, et al v. OSHA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-4091
Not Classified By Court: In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner: TANKCRAFT CORPORATION and PLASTICRAFT CORPORATION
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Amicus Curiae: WISCONSIN MANUFACTURERS & COMMERCE
Michigan, State of et al v. Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership et al
as 1:2020cv01142
Defendant: Enbridge Energy Company, Inc., Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership and Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.
Plaintiff: Governor of the State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, The State of Michigan and others
Amicus Curiae: Dave Yost, Bay Mills Indian Community, Keith Ellison and others
Not Classified By Court: Facilitative Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
State of New York, et al v. DOL, et al
as 19-5125
Plaintiff / Appellee: District of Columbia, State of Maryland, State of Washington and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States of America, United States Department of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
Amicus Curiae: Lake Cities Chamber of Commerce, (Texas), State of Kentucky, by and through Governor Matt Bevin, Las Vegas Latin Chamber of Commerce, (Nevada) and others
Beger v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2016cv00771
Plaintiff: Kelly Beger
Defendant: Aetna Life Insurance Company and Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce Inc Long-Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Axelson v. Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce Inc Long-Term Disability Plan et al
as 2:2015cv00634
Plaintiff: Dennis Axelson
Defendant: Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce Inc Long-Term Disability Plan and Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce et al v. Doyle et al
as 2:2010cv00760
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce and Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce
Defendant: James E Doyle, Jr and Roberta Gassman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
National Association of Manufa v. EPA
as 10-1218
Petitioner: National Association of Manufacturers, American Frozen Food Institute, American Petroleum Institute and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Southeastern Legal Foundation, v. EPA
as 10-1131
Petitioner: John Shimkus, U.S. Representative, Illinois 19th District, John Linder, U.S. Representative, Georgia 7th District, Georgia Agribusiness Council, Inc. and others
Intervenor: Glass Association of North America, State of North Carolina, Utility Air Regulatory Group and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae: Commonwealth of Kentucky, Municipal Gas Commission of Missouri and American Chemistry Council
Natural Resources Defense Coun v. Lisa Jackson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1405
Petitioner: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INCORPORATED and SIERRA CLUB
Respondent: LISA P. JACKSON, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Not Party - Intervenor: AIR PERMITTING FORUM, UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP, WISCONSIN MANUFACTURERS & COMMERCE and others
Arrington, et al v. Elections Board, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2001cv00121
Plaintiff: Rev Olen Arrington, Jr, Alvin Baldus, Stephen H Braunginn and others
Defendant: State of Wisconsin Elections Board, John P Savage, David Halbrooks and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: James R Baumgart, Roger M Breske, Brian T Burke and others
Intervenor Defendant: Scott R Jensen and Mary E Panzer
Amicus Curiae: Leon Young, Annette Polly Williams, Hon Frederick Kessler and others
Interested Party: Wisconsin Government Accountability Board
Petitioner: Janine P Geske
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?