Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Marshall v. Sununu et al
as 1:2023fp00228
Plaintiff:
Krystal Marshall
Defendant:
Christopher Sununu, Judd Gregg, Pembroke Academy High School and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Brown
as 20-1959
Interested Party:
KRISTEN SENZ and WMUR-TV
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWARD LEWIS BROWN
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Sloan v. Hearst Media Company, et al
as 16-1885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAM SLOAN
Defendant - Appellee:
HEARST TELEVISION, INC., WMUR-TV and DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ
Sloan v. Hearst Media Company et al
as 1:2016cv00052
Defendant:
Hearst Media Company, Deborah Wasserman Schultz and WMUR TV Station
Plaintiff:
Sam Sloan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahoney v. Hearst Corporation, et al
as 15-1518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN E. MAHONEY
Defendant - Appellee:
HEARST CORPORATION and WMUR-TV
Defendant:
JOSH DAVIS, Reporter
Levinson v. NHPTV, et al
as 12-1511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL STEPHEN LEVINSON, candidate for United States President
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC TELEVISION, WMUR-TV, INC., WBIN TV and others
Levinson v. New Hampshire Public Television, et al
as 1:2011cv00589
Defendant:
Cable News Network, Federal Communications Commission, New Hampshire Public Television and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Stephen Levinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Loudenslager v. Clear Channel
as 1:2010cv00473
Defendant:
Citadel Broadcasting Co., Clear Channel, Clear Channel Radio and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Alan Loudenslager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
US v. Brown
as 10-1081
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
EDWARD BROWN
Interested Party:
KRISTEN SENZ and WMUR-TV, INC.
US v. Brown
as 09-2402
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ELAINE BROWN
Interested Party:
KRISTEN SENZ and WMUR-TV, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
