Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Reyes v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Edtson Gabriel Reyes
Defendant:
B. Beaver, Wolfgang and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cole v Sage et al
as 1:2023cv01203
In Re:
Jim Scott Cole
Plaintiff:
James Scott Alva
Defendant:
Sage, C.O. Derr, Captain Healey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
JUSTICE, II v. VEONEER, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05193
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
VEONEER, INC., JAN CARLSON, ROBERT W ALSPAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Justice, II v. VEONEER, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04254
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II
Defendant:
VEONEER, INC., JAN CARLSON, ROBERT W ALSPAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WELTCH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03432
Plaintiff:
MATT DELATOUR, KARLY SOLDNER, NINA FROGGATT and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-100 and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bush v. Griffin et al
as 1:2019cv01521
Defendant:
Case Manager Shade, Counselor Griffin, Officer Beaver and others
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MURPHY et al v. ALGARIN et al
as 2:2018cv04207
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER MAXWELL CHILCOTE, ADAM LOGAL, SHAMARR CHANDLER and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, WARDEN ALGARIN, DEPUTY WARDEN MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
