Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Michael Smith v. Frances Cadle, et al
as 21-5370
Defendant / Appellee:
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, CHAD HARLAN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. SMITH
Aliahmed v. Mears, et al
as 1:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
Kelly E.S. Aliahmed, Kelly E. Sakinah, Evonca Sakinah S. Aliahmed and others
Defendant:
Gabriel August, Sgt. Hubbs, Centurion Headquaters for DDOC Contract and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv46396
Plaintiff:
WADE THOMAS MARTIN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv06990
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Wade Thomas
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
THOMAS v. HUFF DISTRIBUTING, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv02058
Defendant:
HUFF DISTRIBUTING, LLC, JASON K HUFF, ANDREA L HUFF and others
Plaintiff:
WADE THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Spencer et al v. Intellifarms, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Tom Spencer and Deloris Spencer
Defendant:
Intellifarms, LLC and Ian Wade Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joffrey Cleveland, et al v. USA
as 15-30947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOFFREY CLEVELAND and WADE THOMAS VISCONTE, doing business as All American Law Firm LA, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND
Wade Hutchins v. Lance Hetmer
as 14-71070
Petitioner:
WADE THOMAS HUTCHINS
Respondent:
LANCE R. HETMER
Hutchins v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv02337
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Wade Thomas Hutchins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02200
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Wade Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
