Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BETHLEHEM et al
as 5:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BETHLEHEM, GLEN ADELSBERGER, LINDA BARTHOLOMEW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
JONES v. ATLAS CONTAINER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv03737
Plaintiff:
DARRIMAS JONES
Defendant:
ATLAS CONTAINER CORPORATION and ANDRE A. WAITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
Rossman v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00703
Plaintiff:
David B. Rossman
Defendant:
The County of Centre, Alesha Weaver, PrimeCare Medical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WAITS v. GLU MOBILE INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01738
Defendant:
GLU MOBILE INC., HANY NADA, GREG BRANDEAU and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC WAITS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WAITE v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03732
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN SCOTT WAITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2019cv01335
Defendant:
MAUREEN MCGRAW-DESMET, CAPT FRANK, C/O RAFFERTY and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WAITE v. FROELICH et al
as 2:2019cv00882
Plaintiff:
DENISE WAITE
Defendant:
KELLIEANNE FROELICH and FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02058
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOWARD et al v. LEVINE
as 2:2016cv00951
Plaintiff:
ALFRED HOWARD and SHIRLEY WAITES-HOWARD
Defendant:
PAUL LEVINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
