Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00036
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00674
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Department of State et al
as 4:2013cv00058
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of State, State of North Carolina, Wake County North Carolina Municipal Governmet and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 4:2013cv00055
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, II
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Wake County N.C., Department of Human Services and Wake County N.C., family Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. Singer et al
as 4:2013cv00007
Plaintiff:
William S. Davis, II, Baby J.F.D. and Estate of William Scott Davis Sr.,
Defendant:
Albert J. Singer, Wake County Governmenet, Danielle Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2011cv00571
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Beaverly Perdue, Melanie A. Shekita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
