Cases 11 - 19 of 19
In Re: Southgate
as 16-2206
Petitioner:
JEREMY CHRISTOPHER SOUTHGATE
Respondent:
SOUNDSPARK, INC, ANA VILLANUEVA, CHRISTOPHER NOLTE and others
In Re: Southgate
as 16-2206
Petitioner:
JEREMY CHRISTOPHER SOUTHGATE
Respondent:
WARNER BROS., INC., SOUNDSPARK, INC, ANA VILLANUEVA and others
Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Zaragoza-Gomez
as 16-1406
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WAL-MART PUERTO RICO
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Interested Party:
MELBA ACOSTA-FEBO, as President of Banco Gubernamental de Fomento
Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Zaragoza-Gomez
as 16-1370
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WAL-MART PUERTO RICO
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Interested Party:
MELBA ACOSTA-FEBO, as President of Banco Gubernamental de Fomento
Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Zaragoza-Gomez
as 3:2015cv03018
Plaintiff:
Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc.
Defendant:
Juan C Zaragoza-Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Munich et al v. City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System et al
as 3:2015mc00501
Petitioner:
Maritza I. Munich
Respondent:
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System
Intervenor_defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Alderson v. Jackson et al
as 1:2010cv10793
Plaintiff:
Bernard Alderson , Michael Fitzgerald , Maureen Estes and others
Defendant:
Lisa P. Jackson, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Laurie Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Ortiz-Cardona v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01157
Plaintiff:
Fernando Ortiz-Cardona
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Walmart.Com USA LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Podgorski v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
as 1:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
Stephen Podgorski
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
