Cases 21 - 30 of 618
ROGGE v. WAL-MART
as 3:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Barbara A Rogge and BARBARA A. ROGGE
Defendant:
WAL-MART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BUNNELL et al v. CITY OF FISHERS et al
as 1:2023cv02113
Plaintiff:
malcolm bunnell and caitlin white
Defendant:
CITY OF FISHERS, OFFICER ROB THOMPSON, OFFICER shawn wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Tyra Jackson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
KIRKLAND et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2023cv01793
Plaintiff:
REBECCA KIRKLAND and PAUL KIRKLAND
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HENDRY v. WAL-MART, INC.
as 1:2023cv01873
Plaintiff:
PAMELA HENDRY
Defendant:
WAL-MART, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ABDELMALAK v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2023cv01978
Plaintiff:
IVIT ABDELMALAK
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WALTERS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2023cv01599
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WALTERS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BENNETT v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2023cv01425
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL BENNETT
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MUNDY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2023cv01309
Plaintiff:
SHELLY MUNDY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
