Cases 31 - 40 of 188
Holmes v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 2:2021cv01064
Plaintiff:
Tonja Holmes
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pair v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 1:2021cv00326
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Plaintiff:
James W. Pair, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 2:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Joshua Miller
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Newberg v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 3:2020cv01849
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Plaintiff:
Ann M. Newberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hillman v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 2:2020cv01625
Plaintiff:
Victoria Hillman
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crosby v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2020cv00729
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff:
Douglas H. Crosby
Petitioner:
Samantha Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lemmond v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 2:2020cv00927
Plaintiff:
Robert Garrison Lemmond
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP and Wal-Mart Stores East LP doing business as Walmart Supercenter Store Number 315
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrelson v. Sam's West, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00324
Defendant:
Brixmor GA Springdale/Mobile Limited Partnership, Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., Sam's West, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jewel Mary Harrelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fultondale, Alabama, City of et al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00848
Plaintiff:
Centre, Alabama, City of, Attalla, Alabama, City Of, Graysville, Alabama, City of and others
Defendant:
Thomas Mason Dunn, Steven Bruce Hefter, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boaz v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 2:2020cv00409
Plaintiff:
Kayla Boaz
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
