Cases 1 - 10 of 771
Boles v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
Candace Boles
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Martin v. Wal-Mart Associates Inc
as 8:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Christopher Martin
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Casselman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
Emma L. Casselman
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart, Inc., Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Account Receivable
Wilson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wilson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Markeen Sessions v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Markeen Sessions
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Arnold v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Bryan Arnold
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Talley v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Shekena Talley
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Nancy Berumen v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Nancy Berumen
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Castro v. Wal-mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CASTRO
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
Moeller v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Tom Moeller
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
