Cases 41 - 50 of 438
Parker v. Garfield Allen et al
as 1:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
John Edward Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
V Garfield Allen, R Daniels, Mayham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Walker v. Brooks, et al
as 3:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Walker
Defendant:
M. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Misty D Walker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00280
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Burton v. Staff 70 Building C.O.S Stith et al
as 1:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Cordarius Denard Burton
Defendant:
Staff 70 Building C.O.S Stith, Ms. Walker and Ms. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernacchi v. State of Utah et al
as 3:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Doug Allen Bernacchi
Defendant:
State of Utah, The Supreme Court of Utah, Paige Petersen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McCaig v. Weimer et al
as 1:2022cv00394
Plaintiff:
Robert L. McCaig
Defendant:
Carroll Weimer, Stephanie Beard, Christopher Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Powell v. Tempple et al
as 1:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
TaSean Powell
Defendant:
Brandon Tempple, Portray Temple, Dillon Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Ratliffe-Walker et al
as 7:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jamie Wayne Dyson
Defendant:
Warden Dana Ratliffe-Walker, Keith Kelly and Mrs. S. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
