Cases 11 - 20 of 45
MCGRATH et al v. WALLY PARK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC
as 2:2017cv02901
Plaintiff:
KEVIN G. MCGRATH and DEBRA MCGRATH
Defendant:
WALLY PARK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUMMERLIN et al v. BAYER CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv03766
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SUMMERLIN , TERRI SUMMERVILLE , TARA SUTPHIN and others
Defendant:
BAYER, CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC. , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kendall et al v. Anadarko E & P Onshore LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01182
Plaintiff:
Charles Rice Kendall , Ann P Hochberg , Bank of America, N.A. and others
Defendant:
Anadarko E & P Onshore LLC, Wallis Run Hunting Club, Inc. and Wallis Run Gas and Oil, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GONZALEZ et al v. DRUE CHRISMAN INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01467
Plaintiff:
DIANA GONZALEZ and WALLY GONZALEZ
Defendant:
DRUE CHRISMAN INC. and LARRY W. VINCENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nguyen v. USA
as 3:2016cv00471
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Wally Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
VASQUEZ v. CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2015cv04297
Plaintiff:
RAMON VASQUEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, ARWIN SANTEE, THOMAS K. FLEMING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. LEHIGH COU. PRISON et al
as 5:2014cv07122
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND RIVERA
Defendant:
LEHIGH COU. PRISON, JANINE M. DONATE, CAROL SOMMERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pepe v. Lamas et al
as 1:2014cv02270
Plaintiff:
David Wilson Pepe
Defendant:
Marirosa Lamas, Wilbert Matthews, Michael Prevost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIKELL v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2014cv01112
Plaintiff:
DAMIEN MIKELL
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, ROBERT GILMORE, JEFFREY ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
