Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Damien Mikell v. Louis Folino, et al
as 17-1049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN MIKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, Fomer Superintendent 2, ROBERT GILMORE, Former Superintendent 1, JEFFREY R. ROGERS, Corrections Classifiation adn Program Manager and others
David Pepe v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 16-3195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILSON PEPE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, Old Superintendent, WILBERT MATTHEWS, G-Unit Manager, MICHAEL PREVOST, Kitchen Supervisor and others
Pepe v. Lamas et al
as 1:2014cv02270
Plaintiff:
David Wilson Pepe
Defendant:
Marirosa Lamas, Wilbert Matthews, Michael Prevost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIKELL v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2014cv01112
Plaintiff:
DAMIEN MIKELL
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, ROBERT GILMORE, JEFFREY ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Elliott, Sr. v. Louis Folino, et al
as 11-3973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH A. ELLIOTT, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, Superintendent at State Correction Institution Greene, WALLY DITTSWORTH, Food service Manager at State Correction Institution Greene and JEFFREY ROGERS, Chairman of the Program Review Committee/Director of Classification at State Correction Institution Greene
ELLIOTT v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2011cv01037
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. ELLIOTT, SR.
Defendant:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, WALLY DITTSWORTH and JEFFREY ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devin Spady, et al v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 09-2933
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEVIN X. SPADY, JOSEPH LOURENSAU, EVOL YOUNG and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, JOHN SCHAFFER, DAVID WAKEFIELD and others
Clay Caldwell v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-3286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAY CALDWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of Corrections, MARK DICARLO, Secretary of Corrections, WALLY DITTSWORTH, Secretary of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
