Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Manning v. Walmart, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00150
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Manning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STEVENS v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 1:2020cv00139
Defendant:
THE NORTH CAROLINA MUTUAL WHOLESALE DRUG COMPANY, BEVERLY SACKLER, RITE AID CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
SUSAN K. STEVENS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF TORIA CAPRI STEVENS and SUSAN K. STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEYSEN v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 1:2020cv00183
Defendant:
ASSOCIATED PHARMACIES, INC., BEVERLY SACKLER, MALLINCKRODT, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Patty Carol Leysen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Specgx, LLC, Beverly Sackler, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sonji B Williams
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00459
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00460
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MILLER v. WALMART INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00271
Defendant:
SARA WRIGHT, WALMART INC. and JIMMY TOWNSEND
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
DAVIDSON COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA, L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00983
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., MALLINCKRODT LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVIDSON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robeson County v. Actavis, LLC et al
as 7:2018cv00163
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, MALLINCKRODT, LLC, H. D. SMITH, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Robeson County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
