Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Chan v. Cirilli et al
as 1:2021cv11135
Plaintiff:
Schultz Chan and Songjiang Wang
Defendant:
David J Cirilli, Sarah E Walters, Stephen E Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Himmelreich v. Spaulding
as 4:2019cv40152
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Petitioner:
Walter Himmelreich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Decarvalho v. Telford et al
as 1:2017cv11224
Plaintiff:
Janito Decarvalho
Defendant:
Erik Telford, Michael McCarthy, Carlton Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walters v. Marchilli
as 1:2016cv12244
Petitioner:
Michael Walters
Respondent:
Raymond Marchilli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2015cv13956
Petitioner:
Walter Thompson
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Paul Presler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rybczyk v. Plymouth County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2015cv10036
Plaintiff:
Walter Rybczyk
Defendant:
Plymouth County Correctional Facility, Joseph D. McDonald, Jr., Brian H. Gillen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mains v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2014cv14770
Plaintiff:
Walter Mains
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, The Woman and Gentlement Enterprise, The Unification Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Thompson
as 1:2014cv14162
Petitioner:
Walter Norris
Respondent:
Michael Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Korzenkiowski v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2014cv12754
Plaintiff:
Walter Korzenkiowski
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, UMass Medical School, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowlkes v. Barry et al
as 1:2014cv12659
Plaintiff:
Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant:
John F. Barry, Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
