Cases 1 - 10 of 1,358
Aguon v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Aguon
Respondent:
F.C.I. Hazleton Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ford v. Lovette
as 3:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Dallas Ford
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richardson-Brown v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00285
Petitioner:
LaTonya Richardson-Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Forbes v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00194
Petitioner:
Dennis A. Forbes
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lott v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Darion D Lott
Respondent:
Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fields v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jay James Fields
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reza v. United States of America - FBOP et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Matthew Reza
Respondent:
United States of America - FBOP and Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Horton v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
Mandrell Horton
Respondent:
Warden W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Derrick A. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Michael Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
