Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mikel Christian v. John MaGill
as 17-7025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEL CHRISTIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN H. MAGILL, S.C.D.M.H., in his individual and official capacity, HOLLY SCATURO, Director - S.V.P.T.P, in her individual and official capacity, KIMBERLY POHOLCHUK, Program Coor. S.V.P.T.P, in her individual and official capacity and others
Jessie Frederick v. John MaGill
as 16-7105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSIE FREDERICK
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN H. MAGILL, Director, S.C.D.M.H., in his individual and official capacity, HOLLY SCATURO, Director - S.V.P.T.P, in her individual and official capacity, KIMBERLY POHOLCHUK, Program Coor. S.V.P.T.P., in her individual and official capacity and others
Johnny Burnside v. Robert Stevenson
as 13-7079
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY BURNSIDE
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT M. STEVENSON, Warden - BRCI
Heupel v. Warden BRCI
as 6:2013cv00592
Plaintiff:
David C Heupel
Defendant:
Warden BRCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Warden BRCI et al
as 3:2010cv02569
Petitioner:
Timothy Lewis Evans
Respondent:
Warden BRCI and State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Paul Smith v. Robert Stevenson
as 10-6837
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT STEVENSON, Warden BRCI
McKinley Williams v. Robert Stevenson
as 09-8175
Petitioner - Appellant:
MCKINLEY WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT STEVENSON, Warden BRCI
Ronald Coulter v. Robert Stevenson
as 09-7849
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD COULTER
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT M. STEVENSON, Warden, BRCI
Clifton Davis v. Robert Stevenson
as 09-7472
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLIFTON L. DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT STEVENSON, Warden, BRCI
Edmonds v. Warden BRCI
as 0:2009cv01910
Petitioner:
David M Edmonds
Respondent:
Warden BRCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
