Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jacoby v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00843
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Monica McCoy, Warden Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Thompkins et al
as 4:2021cv00684
Plaintiff:
Charles E Walker
Defendant:
Steve Thompkins, B Robinson, Lt. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Carter et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
M. Strickland, R. Butler, M. Laman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00191
Plaintiff:
Adrian Kermit Duncan
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Eric Bascomb, Kenneth Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slater v. Richie et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
Demon Slater
Defendant:
Patrice Richie, Warden Carter, Carter F. Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downes v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00437
Plaintiff:
James R. Downes
Defendant:
Department of Corrections , Carter Davenport , Warden Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendrix v. Davenport et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00247
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Hendrix
Defendant:
Carter Davenport , Warden Carter , Captain Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youngblood v. Alabama Department of Corrections, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00214
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Youngblood
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections , Carter Davenport , Warden Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Teal et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Stephone Lvon Marshall
Defendant:
Sgt. Teal, Capt. Strickland, Capt. Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00387
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Kenneth Sconyers, Warden Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
