Cases 1 - 10 of 46
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SMITH v. PERRY et al
as 5:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
JR LESTER J SMITH and LESTER J SMITH, JR
Defendant:
WARDEN CLINTON PERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN PETER EADY, TAMAJI SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. PERRY et al
as 5:2021cv00457
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID WILSON, JR
Defendant:
WARDEN CLINTON PERRY, JESSICA DEAN, LACHAKA MCKENZIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mikhail Shapovalov v. USICE, et al
as 21-2537
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKHAIL IVANOVICH SHAPOVALOV
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and WARDEN CLINTON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Giorgi Buleishvili v. Warden Clinton County Correct
as 21-1797
Defendant / Appellant:
WARDEN CLINTON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GIORGI BULEISHVILI
Rossell v. Perry
as 3:2021cv00056
Petitioner:
Taboris Rossell
Respondent:
Warden Clinton Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWNER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2021cv00066
Defendant:
WARDEN CLINTON PERRY, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LIEUTENANT FREEMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO BROWNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Lall v. Warden Clinton County Correcti, et al
as 21-1012
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, (I.C.E.) and WARDEN CLINTON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY LALL
ADAMS v. PERRY et al
as 5:2020cv00435
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT HARRIS, JOHN DOE, WARDEN CLINTON PERRY and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
