Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ahmond Mason v. Rapides Parish Detention Ctr I, et al
as 20-30473
Defendant / Appellee:
Rapides Parish Detention Center I, Warden Mallette, Warden Dauzat and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ahmond Mason, also known as Ahomond Mason
Zone v. RPDC 1 et al
as 1:2020cv00819
Defendant:
R P D C 1, Warden Dauzat, Warden Mallett and others
Plaintiff:
Dontaevious Zone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sykes v. R P S O - D C - 1 of Alexandria LA et al
as 1:2020cv00608
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Woods, R P S O - D C - 1 of Alexandria LA, Warden Dauzat and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R Sykes, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Rapides Parish Detention Center I et al
as 1:2020cv00582
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Woods, Warden Dauzat, Rapides Parish Detention Center I and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Otis Bailey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Rapides Detention Center 1 et al
as 1:2020cv00524
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Woods, Warden Dauzat, Rapides Detention Center 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Johnthan Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Rapides Parish Detention Center I et al
as 1:2020cv00525
Plaintiff:
Ahmond Mason and Ahomond Mason
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Woods, Warden Dauzat, Rapides Parish Detention Center I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronnie Hongo v. Jerry Goodwin, et al
as 17-30850
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE K. HONGO
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, JAMES M. LEBLANC and others
Hongo v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Hongo and Ronnie K Hongo
Defendant:
Goodwin, LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Scott Cottrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dan Mitchell v. Jerry Goodwin, et al
as 13-31207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, DOCTOR HEARN, DOCTOR FULLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
