Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Lee v. Borla
as 3:2024cv02811
Petitioner:
Webster Lee
Respondent:
Warden Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyler v. Newsom et al
as 5:2024cv02478
Plaintiff:
Juan T. Tyler
Defendant:
Governor of CA Gavin Newsom, Warden Jeffrey Macomber, Warden Edward Borla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Jackson v. Borla
as 1:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
Douglas V Jackson
Respondent:
Warden Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Sharp v. Borla
as 1:2023cv01557
Petitioner:
Anthony Andre Sharp
Respondent:
Warden Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COOK v. PHILBEN
as 3:2023cv00078
Petitioner:
DANIEL DELANE COOK
Respondent:
Warden EDWARD PHILBEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COOK v. PHILBEN
as 3:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
DANIEL DELANE COOK
Respondent:
Warden EDWARD PHILBEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Philbin et al
as 1:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
Allen Bailey
Defendant:
Warden Edward Philbin, DWA Vera Harden and Erica Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Sheldon
as 3:2022cv02274
Petitioner:
Mallon Roberts
Respondent:
Warden Edward T. Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. PHILBIN
as 1:2022cv00120
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN EDWARD PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Massey v. Augusta State Medical Prison et al
as 1:2022cv02496
Plaintiff:
Dwight David Massey
Defendant:
Augusta State Medical Prison, Warden Edward Philbin, Doctor Mary Alston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
