Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Freeman v. Hingle et al
as 4:2011cv00243
Petitioner:
James Freeman
Defendant:
Warden Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Christopher Francis v. Warden Evans Correctional Inst
as 10-6613
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH FRANCIS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Kenny Murray, Jr. v. Warden
as 10-6044
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNY MURRAY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, Evans Correctional Institution
Respondent - None:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Johnnie Gathers v. Willie Eagleton
as 09-7533
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNIE GATHERS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden, Evans Correctional Institution and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER
Bennett v. Warden Evans Correctional Institution
as 3:2009cv00804
Petitioner:
Charles H Bennett, Jr
Respondent:
Warden Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Francis v. Warden Evans Correctional Institution
as 4:2008cv03871
Petitioner:
Christopher Joseph Francis
Respondent:
Warden Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Korell Battle v. Willie Eagleton
as 08-8018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KORELL ROBERT FLOYD BATTLE and KORELL BATTLE, a/k/a Korell Robert Floyd Battle
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden, Evans Correctional Institution, SHARRON PATTERSON and ANTHONY RIDGES, Counsel Substitute
Thompson v. Warden Evans Correctional Institution
as 4:2008cv01661
Petitioner:
John Thompson
Respondent:
Warden Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee v. Warden Evans Correctional Institution
as 4:2007cv02742
Petitioner:
James Tracey Lee
Respondent:
Warden Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muldrow v. McMaster
as 3:2007cv01170
Petitioner:
Edward Leon Muldrow
Respondent:
Warden Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
