Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Charles Lawson v. Warden Cumberland County Jail
as 24-1316
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. LAWSON
Defendant:
WARDEN HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and WARDEN CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON
Goetz v. Warden Hudson
as 8:2023cv00403
Petitioner:
Phil Goetz
Respondent:
Warden Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
EVANS v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2022cv05427
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EVANS
Defendant:
GOVERNOR PHILIP MURPHY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, MAYOR OF BRIDGETON N.J. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. HUDSON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2022cv03945
Plaintiff:
JUAN A. RIVERA
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY JAIL, HUDSON COUNTY MEDICAL DEPT., HUDSON COUNTY FREE HOLDER OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ENCARNACION GONZALEZ v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2021cv16502
Petitioner:
HENRY ALBERTO ENCARNACION GONZALEZ
Respondent:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and WARDEN, HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sloan v. Warden Hudson at AUSP Thomson, IL et al
as 5:2020cv00104
Petitioner:
Jimmy J. Sloan, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Hudson at AUSP Thomson, IL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. Hudson et al
as 3:2020cv50043
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Hudson
Petitioner:
Stephen J.H. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
King v. Hudson et al
as 1:2020cv00499
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Hudson
Petitioner:
Stephen J.H. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sloan v. Warden Hudson at AUSP Thomson, IL et al
as 1:2019cv08384
Petitioner:
Jimmy J. Sloan, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Hudson at AUSP Thomson, IL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McIntosh v. United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv50296
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Hudson
Petitioner:
Rodney Othel McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
