Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Jeremy Mount v. J. Fikes, et al
as 24-1047
Plaintiff:
Jeremy David Mount, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Warden J. Fikes, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of FCI Sandstone of PINE County, D. Drilling, individually and in his official capacities as correctional officer for the mail room of FCI-Sandstone PINE county and J. Best, individually and in his official capacities as Correctional Officer of FCI-Sandstone Mail Room of PINE County
Sylvin v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00069
Petitioner:
Junior Sylvin
Respondent:
Warden J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ordonez v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00063
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Ordonez, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Michael Fiorito v. Warden J. Fikes
as 23-1006
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Fiorito
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden J. Fikes
Mena v. Carvajal et al
as 2:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ruben Mena
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, Colette Peters, Warden D. Edge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Botsvynyuk v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00120
Petitioner:
Stepan Botsvynyuk
Respondent:
Warden J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Botsvynyuk v. Fikes
as 5:2022cv00067
Petitioner:
Stepan Botsvynyuk
Respondent:
Warden J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cole v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00111
Petitioner:
James Owen Cole
Respondent:
Warden J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00093
Petitioner:
Edward Jones
Respondent:
Warden J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Abdur-Rahiim v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00061
Petitioner:
Muhsin Abdur-Rahiim
Respondent:
Warden J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
