Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SYED v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00122
Petitioner: FAWAD SHAH SYED
Defendant: WARDEN M. UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MUNDO v. UNDERWOOD We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00115
Petitioner: GILBERTO MUNDO
Respondent: WARDEN M. UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HALL v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00098
Petitioner: JULIAN HALL
Respondent: WARDEN M. UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
NEWKIRK v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2022cv00201
Petitioner: RASHEEN NEWKIRK
Respondent: WARDEN M. UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GOBERN v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2022cv00167
Petitioner: ALEXIO GOBERN
Respondent: WARDEN M. UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ADEYEMI v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2022cv00134
Petitioner: AKINTUNDE ADEYEMI
Defendant: WARDEN M. UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
COFFELT v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2022cv00129
Petitioner: PHILLIP W. COFFELT
Respondent: WARDEN UNDERWOOD and WARDEN M. UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CORNISH v. UNDERWOOD We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00122
Petitioner: KOREY KASCHIEF CORNISH
Respondent: WARDEN M. UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McGraw v. Underwood We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv02746
Respondent: Warden M Underwood
Petitioner: Bobby Earl McGraw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lane v. Brockman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv02745
Defendant: PA L Brockman, Warden M Underwood and Lt D Montgomery
Plaintiff: Eddie Wayne Lane, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?