Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Wayne Johnson v. May, et al
as 23-3230
Plaintiff:
WAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARDEN MAY, NURSE ROBINSON, NURSE BYRD and others
Theodore Smith, III v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, et al
as 22-3872
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEODORE W SMITH, III
Defendant / Appellee:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, WARDEN MAY, DEPUTY WARDEN WALTERS and others
Powell v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00648
Petitioner:
Leon Powell
Respondent:
Warden May and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burfitt v. May et al
as 3:2022cv00618
Plaintiff:
Lawrence R. Burfitt and Lawrence Burfitt
Defendant:
Warden Harold May, Deputy Warden Ryan Walters, Unit Manager Pettiway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Russell et al
as 1:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
Vernon Montgomery
Defendant:
Sgt. Russell, Warden May, Matthew Dutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shivers Jr. v. May et al
as 1:2021cv01598
Plaintiff:
Dwight L. Shivers Jr.
Defendant:
Natasha L. Hollingsworth, Lt. Heisman, Lt. Kevin S. Lorick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNair v. Warden May et al
as 1:2021cv01354
Petitioner:
Dewayne D. McNair
Respondent:
Warden May and Kathy Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 3:2021cv01421
Plaintiff:
Theodore Smith, III and Theodore W. Smith, III
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Warden May, RWO Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Warden May et al
as 1:2021cv00708
Defendant:
Warden May, Commissioner Claire DeMatteis, Captain Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Tye Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Warden May et al
as 1:2021cv00548
Respondent:
Attorney General of State of Delaware and Warden May
Petitioner:
Daniel Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
