Cases 31 - 40 of 45
James v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2009cv01351
Plaintiff:
Anthony Glenn James, Jr
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Warden Padula, Mr Oberman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bacchus v. Dean et al
as 6:2009cv01226
Defendant:
Major Dean, Associate Warden Bell, Investigator Greer and others
Plaintiff:
David Bacchus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kearse v. Padula et al
as 9:2009cv01031
Plaintiff:
Stafford Kearse
Defendant:
Warden Padula, Ryan B Hutchinson, Russell D Kitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Barnette v. Padula et al
as 9:2009cv00949
Plaintiff:
Freddy Lewis Barnette
Defendant:
Warden Padula, Associate Warden Brooks and Lee CI Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Padula
as 2:2008cv04144
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Defendant:
Warden Padula
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wise v. Padula
as 4:2008cv03795
Petitioner:
James Edward Wise
Respondent:
Warden Padula
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kenneth Lawshe v. Warden Padula
as 08-8065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH LAWSHE, a/k/a Kenneth Glenn Lawshe
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN PADULA, BELL, a/k/a Mary Jane Bell, Associate and Warden, MR. OBERMAN, a/k/a Bruce Oberman and others
Jones v. Padula et al
as 9:2008cv02375
Petitioner:
Charles Ishmael Jones
Respondent:
Warden Padula and Henry D McMaster
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilson v. Patterson et al
as 0:2008cv02199
Plaintiff:
John E Wilson, Jr
Defendant:
Sharon Patterson, C James, NFN Miller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edmonds v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 8:2008cv01351
Petitioner:
Raymond Edmonds
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden Padula
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
