Cases 1 - 10 of 15
KADAMOVAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP), COLLETTE PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HOLDER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
NORRIS G. HOLDER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STEVEN KALLIS, WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
BRYANT v. WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2020cv00300
Respondent:
WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE
Petitioner:
KHALID BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEE v. WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2019cv00468
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE
Petitioner:
DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WESTINE v. WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2017cv00567
Respondent:
US. PROBATION and WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE
Petitioner:
JOHN G. WESTINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WESTINE v. WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2017cv00501
Respondent:
WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE
Petitioner:
JOHN G. WESTINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WESTINE v. USP-TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2017cv00279
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP-TERRE HAUTE
Petitioner:
JOHN G. WESTINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FORD V. WARDEN
as 2:2017cv00093
Petitioner:
KELVIN FORD
Respondent:
WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CLARK v. WARDEN
as 2:2015cv00246
Petitioner:
GEORGE CLARK
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JONES v. WARDEN, U.S.P. Terre Haute
as 2:2015cv00053
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL EUGENE JONES
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
