Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Cutshaw v. Sterlin ET AL et al
as 0:2024cv01947
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Cutshaw
Defendant:
Brian Sterlin ET AL, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Lt Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Goss v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 4:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Jamie Goss
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, China Wuhan Government, United State Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cutner v. Wallace et al
as 6:2023cv05282
Plaintiff:
Lamont Cutner
Defendant:
Warden Wallace, Major Ocean, Sgt Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Spencer Utsey v. Warden Wallace
as 23-6990
Petitioner / Appellant:
SPENCER UTSEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN WALLACE
Burns v. Wallace
as 4:2023cv04829
Petitioner:
Alan L. Burns
Respondent:
Warden Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noe v. Chaplain Latta et al
as 8:2023cv04502
Plaintiff:
Cody A Noe
Defendant:
Chaplain Latta, Warden Wallace, Marshell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bellamy v. South Carolina Dept. of Corrections et al
as 9:2023cv04503
Plaintiff:
Bradley Bellamy
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept. of Corrections, Warden Wallace, Kitchen Supervisor Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Baker v. Dr. Stacy Smith
as 23-6613
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. BAKER, f/k/a William A. Baker, formerly #251725
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. STACY SMITH and WARDEN WALLACE
Mike Salley v. Warden Wallace
as 23-6132
Petitioner / Appellant:
MIKE TYREL SALLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN WALLACE, KCI
Crockett v. Warden Wallace
as 6:2023cv00548
Petitioner:
Timothy Dale Crockett
Respondent:
Warden Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
