Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jeremy Mount v. J. Fikes, et al
as 24-1047
Plaintiff:
Jeremy David Mount, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Warden J. Fikes, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of FCI Sandstone of PINE County, D. Drilling, individually and in his official capacities as correctional officer for the mail room of FCI-Sandstone PINE county and J. Best, individually and in his official capacities as Correctional Officer of FCI-Sandstone Mail Room of PINE County
Harper v. Warden of FCI Waseca
as 0:2023cv02502
Petitioner:
Kelly Harper
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Waseca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kevin Bray v. John Yates
as 23-2148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Brian Bray
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, Warden of FCI-Forrest City (Originally named as USA and Doe)
Harper v. Warden of FCI Waseca
as 0:2023cv01247
Petitioner:
Kelly Harper
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Waseca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Romero v. USA et al
as 2:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Ali Romero
Defendant:
USA and Does Warden of FCI Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jose Chapa v. Lindley, et al
as 20-3026
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles Hendrix, Warden, FCC FCI and Lindley, Correctional Officer, US B.O.P.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Omar Chapa
Manuel Perez Alvarez v. United States, et al
as 19-1791
Defendant / Appellee:
Correct Care Solutions, League Medical Concepts and United States of America
Defendant:
G. Beasley, Warden, Forrest City FCI, Dallas B. Jones, Warden, Beaumont FCI and Does, Staff and Administration, Forrest City FCI and Beaumont FCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Manuel DeJesus Perez Alvarez
Shane Smith v. Anthony Hayne
as 15-1056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shane Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony Haynes, Warden, FCC-FCI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
