Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Anderson v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv03453
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Estill
Petitioner:
Anthony Edward Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crumby v. Warden of FCI Estill
as 2:2018cv01670
Petitioner:
David Crumby
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Estill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roberson v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv01030
Petitioner:
Kewan Roberson
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Estill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crescencio Perez-Perez v. M. Ray
as 17-1578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRECENCIO PEREZ-PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
M. E. RAY, Warden of FCI Estill, SC, as an individual and in his official capacity, C. E. FLOYD, Warden of FCI Estill, SC, as an individual and in his official capacity, E RAIN WATER, A.H.S.A, as an individual and in her official capacity and others
Stokes v. Warden
as 8:2014cv04288
Petitioner:
Eric Stokes
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Estill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miles v. Warden of FCI Estill
as 2:2013cv00721
Petitioner:
Kelvin J Miles
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Estill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Danny Irick v. Mildred Rivera
as 12-8160
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANNY DEWAYNE IRICK
Respondent - Appellee:
MILDRED RIVERA, Warden of FCI Estill
Brown v. Warden of FCI Estill
as 9:2012cv03409
Petitioner:
Jerrod Brown
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Estill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BOLING v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 4:2012cv03368
Petitioner:
Oliver M Boling
Respondent:
Superior Court of the District of Columbia and Warden of FCI-Estill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bradley Sheppard v. Warden of FCI Estill
as 12-6603
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRADLEY SHANE SHEPPARD
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF FCI ESTILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
