Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Myers v. Thompson et al
as 9:2023cv04033
Plaintiff:
Matthew Daniel Myers
Defendant:
Dr. Thompson, Stephen Hoey, Warden of FCI Williamsburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gay v. Warden of FCI Williamsburg
as 1:2023cv03920
Petitioner:
Sherman Carnell Gay
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reed v. Warden of FCI Williamsburg
as 5:2022cv00868
Petitioner:
Nathan Reed and Nathan Carl Reed
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Regassa v. Dunbar et al
as 8:2022cv00466
Petitioner:
Admassu Regassa
Respondent:
Warden R.S. Dunbar, AWR Wilson, Ms. B. White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jeriton Curry v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 21-7313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERITON LAVAR CURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. OLBERDING, SIS Officer, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION WILLIAMSBURG and others
Samuel Pheasant v. Warden Antonelli
as 20-7783
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN ANTONELLI, FCI Williamsburg
Petitioner / Appellant:
SAMUEL EDDIE PHEASANT
Carlos Ortiz v. Warden of FCI-Williamsburg
as 20-7646
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARLOS ORTIZ
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN OF FCI-WILLIAMSBURG
Young v. United States of America
as 9:2020cv01587
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI-Williamsburg
Petitioner:
Nathan Dante Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hardin v. Boggs, FCI Williamsburg
as 9:2019cv03311
Petitioner:
Kelon Renardo Hardin
Respondent:
Warden Boggs, FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joseph Witchard v. Bryan Antonelli
as 19-2317
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BRYAN M. ANTONELLI, Warden of FCI Williamsburg
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH WITCHARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
