Cases 1 - 10 of 1,488
v. Center for Innovations in Evaluative Medicine, LLC d/b/a Warner Orthopedics and Wellness et al
as 3:2024cv00362
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services
Claimant:
Center for Innovations in Evaluative Medicine, LLC d/b/a Warner Orthopedics and Wellness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Amigo Shuttle Inc. v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
as 24-1087
Plaintiff:
AMIGO SHUTTLE INC. and MICHAEL H. CONNERY, JR.
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, KEW T FLYER INC., CHRISTINA CONTUMELIO and others
Star Colbert v. Dougan
as 24-1073
Plaintiff:
STAR COLBERT, ASSENAGON CREDIT SUBDEBT AND COCO, AXIOM EUROPEAN FINANCIAL DEBT FUND LIMITED, Individually and on Behalf of Other Credit Suisse Group AG AT1 Bondholders and others
Defendant:
BRADY W. DOUGAN, ERIC VARVEL, JAMES L. AMINE and others
Scarborough v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Davant Scarborough
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., John Stankey and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
Allen v. Peacock TV LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen
Defendant:
Peacock TV LLC, Regal Cinemas, Inc, Cinemark Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Maslanka et al v. Baird & Warner, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02399
Plaintiff:
Mary Maslanka and David Freifeld
Defendant:
Baird & Warner, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Collinsville Police Pension Board on behalf of the Collinsville Police Pension Fund v. Discovery, Inc.
as 24-646
Plaintiff:
OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OHIO, COLLINSVILLE POLICE PENSION BOARD ON BEHALF OF THE COLLINSVILLE POLICE PENSION FUND, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant:
DISCOVERY, INC., WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY, INC., DAVID ZASLAV and others
Warner Enterprises, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-611
Petitioner:
WARNER ENTERPRISES, INC.
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
